Proofsheet
Illustrative visual preview for Summarise product reviews into pros and consOutput format

Illustrative visual preview. Copy the text prompt or template below; this image is not its tested output.

Chat & workShoppingPlanning

Summarise product reviews into pros and cons

A clear pros-and-cons summary from reviews you paste, with red flags and how often each point came up. Paste this prompt into ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok or Claude, change the parts in brackets to suit you, and generate.

Written for
ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok, Claude
Status
Tested 9 Oct 2026 in Grok, 9 Oct 2026 (one run; model id not exposed)
Test settings
The page's exact default prompt was run once in Grok on 9 Oct 2026. The default details already written on the page were the input. They are illustrative, not a record of a real event. ChatGPT and Gemini were not used. The first result was kept.
Variability
A different set of details, or another run, will change the wording. This is the first result for the defaults on this page.
Prompt
I am considering buying a 1.5-ton split AC. Below are reviews I copied from an online shopping site.

What matters most to me: cooling in peak summer, low noise, reliable after-sales service

Reviews:
"""
Paste 10–30 reviews here, including some 1–3 star ones
"""

Using only these reviews:
1. Top pros and top cons, each with how many reviews mentioned it (e.g. "battery drains fast — 6 of 20").
2. Red flags: defects, safety issues, poor service or returns, and any pattern appearing after weeks or months of use.
3. Reviews that look unreliable (very short, off-topic, repeated wording, or about delivery rather than the product), and whether I should discount them.
4. How the reviews line up with my priorities, in 3 lines.
5. A one-line verdict: looks good / check further / avoid, with the main reason.

Rules: Do not add facts or specs that are not in the reviews. If there are too few reviews to judge, say so. Remind me to check current price and return policy before buying.

Offer to compare with reviews of a second product.

Deduplicate identical review entries before counting and show the reviewed denominator. A short, delivery-related or repeated review is a relevance/quality concern, not proof that the reviewer is fake. Keep the verdict limited to this supplied sample; reviews alone do not establish technical specifications or product safety.

Customise

For example: a 1.5-ton split AC.

For example: an online shopping site.

For example: cooling in peak summer, low noise, reliable after-sales service.

For example: your own pasted reviews.

Fields start with illustrative values; replace them with your own facts. The prompt updates as you type. Copy prompt copies your version.

Example output

Actual tested output. The notes used for this result are an example, not a real event. This box is not copied. Replace the notes above with your own before you paste the prompt.

No product reviews were in the paste. The only text was the instruction to paste 10-30 reviews, including some 1-3 star ones. After treating that as not a review, the sample has 0 reviews. Denominator: 0.

1. Pros: none. Cons: none. There is no count to report.

2. Red flags: none can be read from this sample. Defects, safety issues, service, returns, and problems after weeks or months are unknown here.

3. The placeholder line is an instruction, not a review of the AC. It is off-topic for the product. Discount it completely. It is not evidence that a reviewer is fake. There are no short, repeated, or delivery-only reviews to judge.

4. Cooling in peak summer: not in this sample. Low noise: not in this sample. After-sales service: not in this sample.

5. Verdict: check further. This supplied sample has no reviews, so it cannot support looks good or avoid.

Reviews alone would not establish specifications or safety even after you paste them. The verdict, when there is a sample, stays limited to that sample. Check the current price and the return policy before buying.

Paste the reviews when you have them. I can also compare a second product if you paste that set too.

How to use it

  1. Open ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok or Claude.
  2. Paste the prompt and replace the [BRACKETS] with your details.
  3. Review names, facts and the requested format; follow up with corrections or missing details.
How to use this prompt
  1. Fill Customise with your real details. Do not let the tool guess a missing fact. Write the missing information clearly if you need to.
  2. Press Copy prompt and paste it into the AI app named above. This page copies the prompt. The answer is created in the external app.
  3. Check names, facts, numbers, language and the format you asked for. If something is wrong or incomplete, ask for a correction.

Full guide: Search, Copy, Save and test labels

Good to know

  • It can only judge the reviews you paste; a small or cherry-picked set gives a skewed summary. Run once in Grok on 9 Oct 2026 using the illustrative defaults on this page. Check the draft against your own facts before you use it.
  • Check facts before you rely on the answer.

Try next

Related prompts

Summarise product reviews into pros and cons
Prompt copied